There are _many_ answers to the linking question out there, a simple search will turn them up-
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1394623/can-i-dynamically-call-a-lgpl-gpl-software-in-my-closed-source-application https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10130143/gpl-lgpl-and-static-linking https://fossa.com/blog/open-source-software-licenses-101-lgpl-license/
or even https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html and https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#LGPLStaticVsDynamic On 4/6/2022 4:23 AM, 宋麒 wrote:
Q2: If my commercial product is a "work that uses FFmpeg", do I need to remove all prohibition of reverse engineering from the EULA of my product?
I'd do that anyway; it's pretty much unenforceable, at least in the USA and probably Europe, and tells people that they won't have to look very hard to see how things work.
The first stop for ffmpeg license questions is https://ffmpeg.org/legal.html, and for (L)GPL questions is the FAQs linked above.
z! _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
