Hi, Zachary Harris wrote on Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 09:33:13PM -0400:
> Testing release 0.1.3 of my FHS-utils package is available at > git://everythingwiki.sytes.net/fhs-utils. It currently consists > of three commands: > > fhscheck - check system for FHS compliance [that's an overstatement, but > it checks a couple things, anyway] That doesn't seem portable: test@isnote $ ./fhscheck 2>&1 | tee /tmp/fhs.out Failed to open /etc/ld.so.conf Compilation failed in require at ./fhscheck line 3. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ./fhscheck line 3. test@isnote $ uname -a OpenBSD isnote.usta.de 5.2 GENERIC.MP#336 i386 test@isnote $ man ld.so.conf man: no entry for ld.so.conf in the manual. test@isnote $ man ld.so | grep -F .conf test@isnote $ That file doesn't exist on many UNIX systems. Judging from what i see on a Debian box, what the file does is similar to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable, but still, it seems weird that a portability testing tool crashes on line 3 due to portability issues... :-o Yours Ingo _______________________________________________ fhs-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
