On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 21:58:35 -0800 Mike ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I tend to use a very large brush with the dodge and/or burn tool as my experence is >in a > conventional darkroom and that is most like how I would dodge and burn in the >darkroom. Large brushes are cruel & unusual punishment - they really load up the CPU and produce slow screen updates, even on a fast machine with lots of RAM. It's the amount of data that needs processing quickly when using a large brush. If PS is hitting the disk instead of working in memory, it's going to be ever so slow. You need more RAM and/or faster CPU and/or faster graphics card and/or PS memory % settings need experimenting with. Probably the whole lot, or use a smaller brush and stay solvent;). Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- Re: filmscanners: infos on Nikon LS 2000 or Microte... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: infos on Nikon LS 2000 or Mi... Ezio
- RE: filmscanners: infos on Nikon LS 2000 or Mi... Bob & Glenna Marin
- RE: filmscanners: infos on Nikon LS 2000 o... Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: infos on Nikon LS 20... Red Dwarf
- RE: filmscanners: infos on Nikon LS 20... Mike
- RE: filmscanners: infos on Nikon L... Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: infos on Ni... Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: infos on Ni... Mike
- RE: filmscanners: infos on Ni... OK Photo
- RE: filmscanners: infos on Nikon L... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: infos on Ni... Mike
- RE: filmscanners: infos o... Frank Paris
- filmscanners: Ed's VueSca... Tim Atherton
- filmscanners: Graphics ca... Mikkel H�j
- Re: filmscanners: Graphic... Larry Berman
- RE: filmscanners: Graphic... Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: Graphic... Larry Berman
- RE: filmscanners: Graphic... Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: Graphic... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Graphic... photoscientia
