> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Larry Berman
> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 4:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Graphics card
>
>
> I agree on the Matrox. I've used the G400 for over a year with dual
> monitors on a Win98SE machine. Prior to that I had a "high end" Diamond
> card which left artifacts when I was working with selections in
> Photoshop.
> That's when I did some research and went for the Matrox.
>
> It's a new experience to run Photoshop on two monitors. Working on a full
> screen image on one monitor and accessing the tool pallets from the other
> monitor. (I know, the Mac's always had this capability.)
I am very interested in this since I have a spare 17" monitor. Does the
mouse move seemlessly back and forth between the two monitors, or do you
have to invoke special Matrox hot keys and stuff like that to switch back
and forth? I really haven't read about how this works. Do you have one
seamless piece of real estate or can you actually confine dialogs and
toolboxes on the alternate monitor with a full screen image on the main
monitor?
>
> BTW, PC Magazine just did a review of Graphics cards in the
> January 2, 2001
> issue.
Very cool. That will be fun to read.
Frank Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
