Austin writes ...
> Yes, it appears you are confused about what DMax is. ...
> Second is the ability to discriminate within that voltage
> range, which is 'resolution'....and that is what DMax is.
> DMax is relative in and of itself. ...
And you have always been such a stickler for definitions. When did
Dmax (and Dmin) leave its proper context ... a property of the film
only?
shAf :o)
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Colin Maddock
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's th... Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's th... John D. Horton
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's th... shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's th... Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's th... shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's th... Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's th... shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's th... Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's th... Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's th... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's th... Bob Shomler
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's th... Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's th... Julian Robinson
