>>Nikon may argue that their Dmin is measured with the exposure set low, and >>Dmax with the exposure set as high as possible. This means that they can >>get up to another 2 to 4 stops(!!!) into their claimed DENSITY >>RANGE. Which might explain why they use the term Density Range and not >>Dynamic Range - Dynamic Range certainly means the range that can be covered >>without changing the setup i.e. the range available at one instant. > >Hmmmmm. Well spotted! > >Tony Sleep But they *do* use Dynamic Range in some of their literature (4.2 in Nikon's product data sheet for the 4000 ED and their model comparison sheet, provided by Nikon at this past week's Mac World).
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? John D. Horton
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Bob Shomler
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: Vuescan 6.4.8 problems with Canoscan FS2710 ... Richard
- Re: filmscanners: Vuescan 6.4.8 problems with Canoscan FS2... Dean Brown
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- filmscanners: 1:1024 range 8-bit linearly encoded Rick Trelles
- Re: filmscanners: 1:1024 range 8-bit linearly encoded Tony Sleep
