On Sat, 13 Jan 2001 13:19:01 +1100 Julian Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Nikon may argue that their Dmin is measured with the exposure set low, and > Dmax with the exposure set as high as possible. This means that they can > get up to another 2 to 4 stops(!!!) into their claimed DENSITY > RANGE. Which might explain why they use the term Density Range and not > Dynamic Range - Dynamic Range certainly means the range that can be covered > without changing the setup i.e. the range available at one instant. Hmmmmm. Well spotted! Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? John D. Horton
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Bob Shomler
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: Vuescan 6.4.8 problems with Canoscan FS... Richard
- Re: filmscanners: Vuescan 6.4.8 problems with Canosca... Dean Brown
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- filmscanners: 1:1024 range 8-bit linearly encoded Rick Trelles
