You were right the first time! It's Canon D30 and Olympus E10 :-) In article <005b01c08931$ff1960f0$798902c3@office>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Wilkinson) wrote: > OOOps > Sorry I posted a reference to the Olympus E10 > It should have been the Canon E10, silly me ! > > Michael Wilkinson. 106 Holyhead Road,Ketley, Telford.Shropshire TF 15 DJ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.infocus-photography.co.uk > For Trannies and Negs from Digital Files > > >
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real va... Robert DeCandido
- 8x10 printing was Re: filmscanners: SS40... Rob Geraghty
- filmscanners: Re: Epson 860 Robert DeCandido
- Re: 8x10 printing was Re: filmscanne... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Hart or Mary Jo Corbett
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real va... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Hart or Mary Jo Corbett
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Hart or Mary Jo Corbett
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real va... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Cannon not Olympus Michael Wilkinson
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 rea... Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Hart or Mary Jo Corbett
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Hart or Mary Jo Corbett
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real va... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Michael Wilkinson
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Berry Ives
- Re: filmscanners: real value? IronWorks
- Re: filmscanners: real val... Roman Kielich®
- Digital film: was:films... Alan Tyson
- Re: Digital film: was:f... Hersch Nitikman
- Re: filmscanners: real... Michael Wilkinson