on 1/29/01 2:21 PM, Michael Wilkinson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If you really want good value for money allied to something which will > last a decade you have to look at what you want from the product. > ....buy it at the right price and you are set for > the next Decade > Make no mistake about it. > if a scanner is doing a good job now the chances are that only a real > expert will be able to see a difference in your final output in 10 years > time. Very daring of you to make a 10-yr forecast about anything digital. Here's my forecast: 35mm film will be rarely used, except for very specialized applications, since digital will take over that market. Digital SLRs will be as affordable as the Pentax XZ-5n. The scanners will still be around, though, since there are so many old images on film. But the ones we are buying today will definitely be in the landfill. --Berry
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real va... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Hart or Mary Jo Corbett
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Hart or Mary Jo Corbett
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real va... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Cannon not Olympus Michael Wilkinson
- Re: filmscanners: Cannon not Olympus Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Hart or Mary Jo Corbett
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Hart or Mary Jo Corbett
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real va... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Michael Wilkinson
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Berry Ives
- Re: filmscanners: real value? IronWorks
- Re: filmscanners: real val... Roman Kielich®
- Digital film: was:films... Alan Tyson
- Re: Digital film: was:f... Hersch Nitikman
- Re: filmscanners: real... Michael Wilkinson
- RE: filmscanners: real... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: real... Ian Jackson
- Re: filmscanners: real... Michael Wilkinson
- filmscanners: GPIB Scan... Chris McBrien
- RE: filmscanners: real... Laurie Solomon