On Sat, 8 Jun 2002 16:17:30 +0100, you wrote: >Personally I do some sharpening for an archival image that may end up going >to different outputs. This is only a minor sharpening to restore the >sharpness of the original which is almost always softened by the scanning >process. Most images will benefit from further sharpening when targeting for >a specific output but this should not really be done for an archival copy.
Speaking of sharpening - I think I understand this in a sort of sloppy "intuitive" way, but could someone offer a technical explanation of why sharpening has so much more visible effect on jpegs as opposed to TIFFs? Ken Durling Visit my new easier-to-browse PhotoSIG portfolio: http://www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=203 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
