>Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 12:17:43 +0200 >From: Johannes Gebauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Finale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On 13.07.2002 2:28 Uhr, Richard Walker wrote [schnipp schnipp] >> 10. Full AppleScript implementation. > >Not sure that would be much help. What I would suggest is some sort of >universal plugin that allows scripting and access to all enigma data.
Full AppleScript *would* be "some sort of universal plugin that allows scripting and access to all ENIGMA data." Wouldn't help the Windowagers... don't y'all have anything like AppleScript yet? >Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 12:17:43 +0200 >Subject: Re: [Finale] Metatools/type in score (long) >From: Johannes Gebauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On 13.07.2002 8:06 Uhr, Mark D. Lew wrote > >> As I mentioned, type-in-score isn't a priority for me anyway. I'm more >> interested in expanding metatools. How about two-letter metatools? How >> about a window that lets me edit my metatool assignments more efficiently? >> Of course, if you expand two-letter metatools to three-letter metatools, >> and then to many-letter metatools, then it's the same thing as a name >> anyway. > >How would a two-letter metatool work? Surely not by pressing both of them at >once? Think WordStar... (Incidentally, that's why I'm not particularly fond of the idea, although the extension to typed-in list selection can be OK) Cheers -- P. --------------- <http://www.bek.no/~pcastine/Litter/> --------------- Peter Castine | From the Litter Power Thesaurus: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Uniform distribution: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | lp.shhh, lp.shhh~, lp.tata, lp.titi _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
