Oh, I don't think anyone here or anywhere else would argue that Finale is *easier* to use than Sibelius! :-) The discussion usually centers around power and flexibility vs. ease of use.
That said, yes, we are spending considerable energy trying to come up with easier ways to do things *without* losing the power and flexibility that we depend on from Finale. Randy > -----Original Message----- > From: Randolph Peters [mailto:randolphpeters@;shaw.ca] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 9:33 AM > To: Stokes, Randy > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Finale] Re: Paul McCartney > > > Stokes, Randy wrote: > >Along when Liverpool Oratorio came out, I remember reading > something that > >said that McCartney still took some pride in not being able > to read or write > >notation. You can't do much even with Sibelius if you can't > read music. > > > >I wonder if he finally changed his spots? > > > >Randy > > "Even with Sibelius" is a curious turn of phrase. Does this imply > that the guru of Finale concedes certain advantages to the > competition, especially when it comes to servicing the more > notationally-challenged user? ;-) > > -Randolph Peters > _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
