At 4:55 AM -0500 3/02/03, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, at 03:52 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:

I don't quite follow this argumentation: It is true that HD based digital
recorders have advantages to DATs, but they still have some disadvantages as
well. Obviously reliability is actually _the_ factor in any recording
environment. But the main advantage of a DAT is unlimited recording
capability. Just eject the tape and put in another one. Can't beat that with
any HD based recorder - yet.

Johannes,


A single DAT can hold just 2 hours of continuous uncompressed CD-quality digital audio. My lowly first-generation 5GB iPod can hold 7.3 hours of same, and the current top-line model can hold almost 30 hours.


iPods can handle CD-quality audio? I have been under the impression that iPods operate with compressed audio, like MP3s.

I was also under the impression that the iPod used battery-backed RAM for storage, rather than a hard drive. Am I wrong about that, too? You own one, so I imagine you know about what you speak.

Christopher

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to