At 12:59 PM 7/7/04 -0400, Andrew Stiller wrote:
>I picked it up from philosopher Daniel Dennett, who 
>so far as I know originated it. It is a useful expreession 
>because it is very easy to overlook scare quotes when 
>reading, and they tend to be used very sneakily in much 
>formal argument, with the intention of making you shy 
>away from accepting the enclosed term at face value, 
>without the author having to actually make a case why 
>you should do so. A parenthetical "(sic)" used to be used 
>the same way, but scare quotes are much more subtle and 
>insidious. That said, their use can be perfectly legitimate--so 
>long as everybody understands what's being done. Anyway, 
>if you don't call them "scare quotes," what do you call them?

Just quotes. But I'd be happy to use a less negative term such as the
nicely alliterative "quarrel quotes" -- credit me, please. :)

I use quarrel quotes for a term belonging to the person, interest group,
subculture, party, corporation, government (etc.) putting forth the term's
meaning that is not in common with my meaning. The quotes demonstrate that
it is *in fact* a quote, and beyond that, it is not my meaning (as the
writer doing the quoting). So to me it's not insidious at all; it's a
shortcut to saying "I am quoting this because the usage or meaning are not
mine, but that of the person quoted. My point of view will become clear by
the context in which I am quoting it, whether ironic or argumentative or
sardonic. In order to do this successfully, I must assume you have read or
heard that usage, so you understand it, or that if you have not read or
heard that usage, you will realize my intent and seek out the full original
quote -- which it is certainly not my responsibility to present, as that
puts forth an argument which is not mine and wastes my time and everyone
else who is already familiar with that usage. In the interim, therefore, do
not accept the meaning as mine, get off your mental butts, and do some gosh
darn thinking."

What's insidious is labeling this benign usage with the pejorative "scare".
Did anybody ever get scared? Was this a assonant play on "air quotes"? Or
maybe poor ol' Dennett has an axe to grind, eh? A wounded curmudgeon
philosopher who's been on the receiving end of quarrel quotes too often,
perhaps? :) :) :)

Dennis



_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to