Darcy James Argue wrote:
Hi Owain,

I agree, but there are lots old editions out there with the order reversed (new value = old value). I don't know why *anyone* ever thought that was a good way of indicating tempo shifts, but unfortunately, it's not uncommon.


Interesting - I'll look out for such editions! But can they really ever cause anything more than momentary confusion...how many times can such a shift occur at a place where it's not screamingly obvious that the new section is four times too fast or slow?!
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to