Darcy James Argue wrote:
Hi Owain,
I agree, but there are lots old editions out there with the order
reversed (new value = old value). I don't know why *anyone* ever
thought that was a good way of indicating tempo shifts, but
unfortunately, it's not uncommon.
Interesting - I'll look out for such editions! But can they really ever
cause anything more than momentary confusion...how many times can such a
shift occur at a place where it's not screamingly obvious that the new
section is four times too fast or slow?!
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale