Yeah. I agree. Thinking about it, if I do changes, it is AFTER parts are
extracted, after they have been "proof played". That is when someone
goes "You know, this would be better. Or that looks funny".
If Finale does part linking/dynamic parts, or whatever you want to call
it, it needs to be TWO way. If you make a change in the part, or in the
score, they BOTH get updated.
Andrew Stiller wrote:
Of all the long list of proposed features that follows, I'm not at all
sure I feel a need for *any* of them. Darcy is asking for a
profusion of new dialog boxes and windows, whereas I would have
thought it obvious that any dynamic parts linking should be
transparent: I change the score, the change is automatically (after
signing off on an alert box) conveyed to the parts. Period.
And as I wrote in a separate post, even that would be much less
useful to me than the reverse: change a part and have it
automatically (after an alert box) affect the score.
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
