David W. Fenton wrote:
You would automatically recognize the 60.75 as a particular ratio in comparison to the previous metronome marking? Gee, you must be one of those Rain Man math whizzes.
You expect everything to be sightreadable? That must be very limiting.
If it said 9:8 (Q=60.75), I'd have no objections. It's the use of the Q=60.75 by itself that is nonsense.
But after the accel, 9:8 would *not* be an accurate indication - it's the ratio of what happened several bars earlier to what happens now.
_______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
