Sorry, Phil. I overreacted because it was so old as to defy relevance in
my eyes. But of course I know the program. I'm sure it's interesting and
relevant to someone who hasn't been tracking its progress.. See the
response on this list from Daniel at Sibelius, to whom I forwarded your
post. Hope that's not a copyright violation! ;-)
Ken
At 07:18 AM 7/13/2005, you wrote:
At 7/13/2005 09:49 AM, Ken Durling wrote:
>I don't have time to go over this point by point, but this list looks like
>it was from version 1.4. I'm really not sure what relevance it has at this
>point. But at a glance I see things that have been fixed, things that
>haven't and things that display an ignorance of how Sibelius works. Did
>you really mean to prolong the already protested Sibelius thread by asking
>for this long list to be addressed, or is this just an out-of-date
>"Sibelius bash?"
I just thought it was interesting and possibly relevant. I guess not.
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
