> >>The fact that Mr Spreadbury submitted the Sibelius entry, whereas > >>the Finale entry fell by default to the only person who > >>volunteered, tells me something about the difference between > >>MakeMusic and Sibelius. The latter saw an opportunity to show off > >>their product and made sure that they got one of their most > >>knowledgeable employees to do a first-rate job. > > > > > > Cough! Are we looking at the same piece of music. > > > > The quality of the engraving isn't in question here - the fact that > the company participated is. Look at the MakeMusic submission -- > it's far inferior to the Sibelius submission. I can't even see the > notes or the staves for the MakeMusic submission!
It's not a MakeMusic submission. Presonally I think they should stay out of things as badly organised as this. There are far better way of promoting their product than getting involved in badly thought out competitions. This nothing but a mildly interesting sideline. What is far more interesting is the talk of a well organised comparison, this thing though, it's utterly throw away. Simon Troup Digital Music Art _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
