On 17 Aug 2005 at 13:53, Darcy James Argue wrote: > The whole point is that after years of being > shackled by Motorola's and IBM's disappointing production, Apple had > little choice but to go with x86 processors or continue to be left > behind (especially w/r/t portables).
I thought that reason for the switch had been shown to be bogus, just an excuse to mask their real reasons for the switch, which remain obscure? -- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton David Fenton Associates http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
