David W. Fenton / 2005/09/28 / 03:58 PM wrote: >I couldn't find anything recent that was not a plugin. And the only >things I did find were WAV only, or I could not figure out how to >analyze a file without playing it (which will muck up the analysis by >being polluted with the frequency response and noise level of my >computers audio system).
Here is your Couperin of 128 vs 192 analysis. What I did was to take the left channel of 128 k and compared against the left channel of 192 k. This shows more accurate comparison. <http://www.a-no-ne.com/temp/128vs192_2.gif> You are right that the file still needs to be processed in real-time because the data is only reproducible in real-time, but it does not need to be actually played. I ran this analysis on my Powerbook without using any hardware. -- - Hiro Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA <http://a-no-ne.com> <http://anonemusic.com> _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
