Johannes Gebauer / 2005/10/11 / 03:22 PM wrote: >Unfortunately it simply cannot do what I need to do.
I am curious what you can't do with DSP-Q that you can do with Peak? Just curious. >SonicStudio does not run on OS X. It requires OS 9, and therefor cannot >run on any machine currently available. It's dead. I saw it was running fine on OSX at AES :-) <http://www.sonicstudio.com/products/ddp/ddp01.html> >I will be going ProTools. For what I need it seems to actually be better >than Peak, and quite a bit cheaper with the MBox. True. I left PT at version 5. I don't like their business model. They charged me $50 for PACE upgrade on SDII when OS8.1 killed PACE, which upset me very much. I have been a MOTU user since 1987. Being Perf/DP user this long, PT isn't intuitive to me. By the way, at AES, I received a very interesting info from a well known DSP engineer whose name should remain unmentioned. He hacked Peak POWr, only to find the algo is written only for 44.1k, meaning if you apply to any other sample rate then it doesn't sound as good as when applied to 44.1k. He also found the same algo published by someone else before POWr. And POWr patent was denied because of this publication existed previously. Interesting :-) P.S. I am not sure if anyone else on this list is interested in this OT thread. Should we stop? -- - Hiro Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA <http://a-no-ne.com> <http://anonemusic.com> _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
