Johannes Gebauer / 2005/11/24 / 01:06 PM wrote: >To be honest, I don't really blame them. It's partly Apple's fault for >having two such huge changes (three if you count the move to the PPC >chips) in a relatively short time. Personally I think Apple should have >gone "dual-processor" when they introduced OS X. Publically, that is, >not secretly as they did.
Why is that? It's not like Finale needs to know if the host is dual or single processor. The only app needs to know if dual proc would be something like heavy DSP which process needs to be divided from main host app process. Finale isn't that kind of app. Any app that will have problem on porting to Intel proc is ones coded with CodeWarrior, a 3rd party Dev Tool, while Apple has been offering much better env, Xcode since the early OSX era. It is easy for me to say they should had rewritten their app from ground up when Xcode was introduced, and I do fully understand it will cost them a lot in R&D, but Apple's intention was clear back then. -- - Hiro Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA <http://a-no-ne.com> <http://anonemusic.com> _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
