On 3 Feb 2006 at 16:24, Christopher Smith wrote: > I have often maintained that the movable do > system is superior to the fixed do system, but since the French > fixed-do students were solfeging circles around the McGill students, > and still are, it is a hard argument to back up.
It shouldn't be surprising that fixed do should be faster, since all it's really doing is naming the note names, while movable do is a process of analysis of scale degree function. That is, there's much more going on with movable do than with fixed do, and that's its value in the first place. But it's also why it's not going to be as easy to learn. -- David W. Fenton http://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
