I would have thought that in most cases the soloist's discretion
would be sufficient, with consideration of how soon their next solo
passage is etc. If there is some particular reason to suppress the
soloist then you may have to resort to a specific instruction such as
tutti (solo tacet). In a Call and Response situation, solo and gli
altri seems to me to be very clear.
John
On 28 Feb 2006, at 01:52, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Really? So how do you differentiate passages that are to be sung by
_all_ (including the soloist)?
In orchestral work, "gli altri" or "the rest" = "everyone but the
soloist," which is not the same as "tutti." My client doesn't seem
to think "the rest" is clear enough, but I still need a good way of
distinguishing "everybody but the soloist" from "everyone including
the soloist."
- Darcy
-----
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://secretsociety.typepad.com
Brooklyn, NY
On 27 Feb 2006, at 8:34 PM, Martin Banner wrote:
Tutti
Martin
On Feb 27, 2006, at 8:28 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
A question:
What is the standard indication, in works for SATB chorus, that a
passage is to be sung by everyone except the soloist (when, e.g.,
the soprano soloist shares a staff with the rest of the sopranos)?
- Darcy
-----
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://secretsociety.typepad.com
Brooklyn, NY
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Martin Banner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
