I used Finale 2005a with Acrobat 6.0 on XP Box.
Johannes, your PDF looked fine. There weren't any issues.
The quality of it also made me wonder that I was doing something wrong.
My apologies too for bring up an issue that may have been discussed earlier. I tend to focus on a narrow band of issues that are a roadblock at the time, and I tend not to pay a lot of attention if it's not something I am working on at that time. I just finally settled most of the other troubles Finale has given me, when I had this trouble with the PDF. So the list's patience is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Kim
Kim
On 4/26/06, Johannes Gebauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 26.04.2006 Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
> Here's a sample of my PDF @ http://www.bytenet.net/kpclow/finale/sample.pdf I used the highest setting possible (Printer's quality) and I upped the DPI to 2400. Still not as good as this Molter sample, or the Sibelius. My beams seem very ragged, no matter how much you zoom in. And I noticed that Finale's staff lines seem too thick. And some of the articulations and words have a splotchy look.
Which platform. Which Distiller. Which Finale version.
How do the PDFs I sent you recently compare?
I am pretty sure this is the known FinWin only problem. There has been a
lot of discussion about this in the past. I don't know the details, but
I was under the impression that Fin2k6 corrected this.
The problem has never been reported for Mac PDFs created from Finale, so
I would be surprised if the same was true for the PDFs I sent you, but I
am interested to hear your opinion.
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
--
Kim Patrick Clow
"There's really only two types of music: good and bad." ~ Rossini
_______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
