Another EUR0.02:
 
1. Many orchestral brass players lament the current trend towards 6/4 tubas, 
huge-bore bass trombones, and large-bore "tenor-bass" trombones.  I've 
rehearsed with at least one group where there were reflecting devices to 
deflect the brass sounds away from the rest of the group. (I do not consider 
myself [tenor tuba] to have been part of the problem).  Of course, this 
"equipment problem" is primarily a "performer problem" but my sense is that 
many younger conductors have grown up with that sound and don't know anything 
else. My teacher, Harvey Phillips, had no trouble BLENDING with an orchestra or 
soloing with it, on what we would call today a 3/4 CC tuba. He simply does not 
understand the need for such huge equipment or why it has to be played by some 
individuals "full-bore."
 
2. In the band realm, I attended an interesting presentation about Sousa's 
scoring...it worked in his day because the trombones, euphoniums, and tubas  
(and to some extent the trumpets) in that band were peashooters compared to 
today's equipment.
A solo and band performance I gave at the Great American Brass Band Festival, 
on an instrument owned by one of Sousa's euphoniumists, really hammered that 
home to me. It's no wonder that Sousa's original scoring sounds so odd today...
 
3. The cimbasso is also coming back, esp. in the LA studios.  That's a valved 
bass trombone, pitched usually in F, though CC and BBb versions 
exist...performer sits, with valves in front and bell looping around back 
before pointing front.


And of course, in the 20th-21st centuries, "tenor trombone" really
means  tenor-bass trombone, w. a trigger. I know a lot of
first-trombonists prefer the old simplex tenor, because it is lighter
in weight and 1st trb. parts almost never need the trigger, but it
seems to me that most composers these days assume that even the first
trombone can and will play down to low C, not to mention the pedals.

Another inst. more frequently seen nowadays is  the Cbtrb, especially
the one in non-transposing F  w. 2 or 3 low triggers. Now *there's* an
instrument that  really sounds different from the tenor trombone, and
to me the ideal trb. section (for new works, of course)  would be 2 trb
and 1 cbtrb.

An interesting case is Berg's 1929 _Three Pieces for Orchestra_. Berg
asks for 3 tenors and one bass trombone, but in a footnote to the
instrument list, Heinz Erich Apostel says that the first trombone part
was originally written in alto clef, but changed to tenor clef in the
published part w. the composer's blessing. Apostel goes on to say that
the part lies so high that it might be better played on an alto
trombone or an Eb tenor trumpet--but then at reh. no. 155 Berg asks the
first trombone (also the 2d and 3d) to play a louder-than-ff D below
the bass staff. Berg specifically expects a "Pedalton," but I don't
think any trombonist at all these days would play it that way, but
would use the F trigger. Meanwhile the bass trombone is asked to play
the D below that--the bottom D on the piano. I heard a performance of
this w. the Buffalo Philharmonic where the most amazing blat came out
there--just what I think Berg wanted; but to get it that loud, the 4th
trb. player was using a contrabass trb. for the whole part.

Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Another EUR0.02:
 
1. Many orchestral brass players lament the current trend towards 6/4 tubas, 
huge-bore bass trombones, and large-bore "tenor-bass" trombones.  I've 
rehearsed with at least one group where there were reflecting devices to 
deflect the brass sounds away from the rest of the group. (I do not consider 
myself [tenor tuba] to have been part of the problem).  Of course, this 
"equipment problem" is primarily a "performer problem" but my sense is that 
many younger conductors have grown up with that sound and don't know anything 
else. My teacher, Harvey Phillips, had no trouble BLENDING with an orchestra or 
soloing with it, on what we would call today a 3/4 CC tuba. He simply does not 
understand the need for such huge equipment or why it has to be played by some 
individuals "full-bore."
 
2. In the band realm, I attended an interesting presentation about Sousa's 
scoring...it worked in his day because the trombones, euphoniums, and tubas  
(and to some extent the trumpets) in that band were peashooters compared to 
today's equipment.
A solo and band performance I gave at the Great American Brass Band Festival, 
on an instrument owned by one of Sousa's euphoniumists, really hammered that 
home to me. It's no wonder that Sousa's original scoring sounds so odd today...
 
3. The cimbasso is also coming back, esp. in the LA studios.  That's a valved 
bass trombone, pitched usually in F, though CC and BBb versions 
exist...performer sits, with valves in front and bell looping around back 
before pointing front.


And of course, in the 20th-21st centuries, "tenor trombone" really
means  tenor-bass trombone, w. a trigger. I know a lot of
first-trombonists prefer the old simplex tenor, because it is lighter
in weight and 1st trb. parts almost never need the trigger, but it
seems to me that most composers these days assume that even the first
trombone can and will play down to low C, not to mention the pedals.

Another inst. more frequently seen nowadays is  the Cbtrb, especially
the one in non-transposing F  w. 2 or 3 low triggers. Now *there's* an
instrument that  really sounds different from the tenor trombone, and
to me the ideal trb. section (for new works, of course)  would be 2 trb
and 1 cbtrb.

An interesting case is Berg's 1929 _Three Pieces for Orchestra_. Berg
asks for 3 tenors and one bass trombone, but in a footnote to the
instrument list, Heinz Erich Apostel says that the first trombone part
was originally written in alto clef, but changed to tenor clef in the
published part w. the composer's blessing. Apostel goes on to say that
the part lies so high that it might be better played on an alto
trombone or an Eb tenor trumpet--but then at reh. no. 155 Berg asks the
first trombone (also the 2d and 3d) to play a louder-than-ff D below
the bass staff. Berg specifically expects a "Pedalton," but I don't
think any trombonist at all these days would play it that way, but
would use the F trigger. Meanwhile the bass trombone is asked to play
the D below that--the bottom D on the piano. I heard a performance of
this w. the Buffalo Philharmonic where the most amazing blat came out
there--just what I think Berg wanted; but to get it that loud, the 4th
trb. player was using a contrabass trb. for the whole part.

Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to