Robert Patterson wrote:
Carl Dershem wrote:
Harlan Ellison
I just skimmed his article. Where should I direct my skepticism? What I
read coincides well with my information from other sources (many of
which predate Wikipedia by decades). Furthermore, the opinion and fact
in the article seem to be clearly delineated as such.
I've known Harlan for almost 40 years, and he is anything but pleased
with the article. When he was first told he had an entry there he went
in and looked at it, found some errors (like where he was born) and
corrected them. The next day the errors had returned. He changed tham
back and then spoke to those in charge. Their response was basically
"that's the way it works".
Ben (who I've known for more than 20 years) has had a very similar
experience.
cd
--
http://www.livejournal.com/users/dershem/#
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
