At 7/26/2006 02:44 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
>No, it's a recent version of Windows, and the best workstation
>version of Windows ever released (the best server version is Windows
>Server 2003, which has none of the awful problems of WinXP).
In your opinion, which varies substantially from the rest of the world.
>Software doesn't rust, so the idea of Win2K being "old" baffles me.
>Only idiots think that the newest and the greatest is required for
>stable and fast performance. WinXP is neither, while Win2K is both. I
>don't care if it was 6.5 years ago that Microsoft released it -- it
>is still the best version of Windows Workstation, and is quite widely
>used everywhere.
Please refrain from correcting people who post absolutely correct answers
based on your ancient version of Windows.
Phil Daley < AutoDesk >
http://www.conknet.com/~p_daley
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
