On 8 Aug 2006 at 18:25, Darcy James Argue wrote: > On 08 Aug 2006, at 6:13 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: > > >> Seriously, Apple has been using multiple processors for > >> *years*. . . . > > > > Because they have to, no? > > Yes, but it worked -- Apple's G4 and G5 towers were able to stay in > the game (even winning some Photoshop shootouts) despite the fact > that Intel's chips had better raw speed, because Apple spent a *lot* > of time optimizing OS X for multiple processors, and encouraged all > of its high-end developpers to do the same. > > That's why Tyler's complaints are so strange -- Apple has already put > in years and years of optimizing for multiple processors, and now he > wants them to throw it all away... ?
I thought he was writing from the Windows side of things? -- David W. Fenton http://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
