Keith has only ever been talking about his own use. But he (and
others) have assumed that legally, he must re-purchase a set of
replacement parts, and that re-engraving or photocopying the
deteriorating parts would be a violation of copyright. This seems
wrong to me on principle, but then again, much of copyright law does.
Cheers,
- Darcy
-----
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://secretsociety.typepad.com
Brooklyn, NY
On 23 Aug 2006, at 1:33 PM, Andrew Stiller wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 8:36 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Can someone explain why, legally, Keith can't just photocopy or re-
engrave the deteriorating parts?
For his own use, he absolutely can. The only problem is if he made
a copy for somebody else who had not purchased the original.
Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
