I believe that one of the copyright laws allows copying of "no longer
published parts".
But I am far from a legal person.
At 8/23/2006 01:37 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
>Keith has only ever been talking about his own use. But he (and
>others) have assumed that legally, he must re-purchase a set of
>replacement parts, and that re-engraving or photocopying the
>deteriorating parts would be a violation of copyright. This seems
>wrong to me on principle, but then again, much of copyright law does.
Phil Daley < AutoDesk >
http://www.conknet.com/~p_daley
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
