You may opt for it, but try putting that in front of a professional
orchestra that costs many $100's per minute of rehearsal, and see how
much time you waste explaining it.
The current system may be imperfect, but it is perfectly workable, and
it won't cost you even $0.05 worth of rehearsal time. Anyway, your
suggestion even less Finale-friendly than the double-whole rest.
dhbailey wrote:
I would opt for a shortened version of the multiple measure rest.
Without a number overhead (or with a 1) it would be a single measure
entirely silent, and with numbers it would indicate multiple measures of
rest.
--
Robert Patterson
http://RobertGPatterson.com
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
