On 23 Oct 2006 at 18:03, Mark D Lew wrote: > On Oct 23, 2006, at 11:22 AM, David W. Fenton wrote: > > > That is exactly the opposite of what I was saying. The *lack* of > > those in modern fonts is the abberation. > > Omitting the "lack of" or "without" was just a slip-up in my typing my > last post. I did understand that you meant just the opposite. > > > It's not a clarification. It's a repetition of what I said > > originally. > > Well, whatever it was, I was confused by your original post, where you > seemed to be saying that the existence of fixed-width numerals was an > "aberration". I understood your point after the following post in > which you specified that the aberration was the unavailability of > anything *but* fixed-width numerals.
But it's exactly the same thing I've said in all my posts on the subject. I'm not sure why you read the original as saying the opposite. -- David W. Fenton http://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
