On Mar 21, 2007, at 6:49 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 21.03.2007 Darcy James Argue wrote:
So, in your example, the measure under the first ending is m.16, the
measure under the second ending is m.17, and the first measure
following the second ending is m.18.
This is definitely completely non-standard for classical music. Look
into any complete edition, NBA, NMA, you name it. Never will it be
done like this.
First "always" and now "never?" The world doesn't work like that.
Look into my ongoing Heinrich gesamtausgabe (now up to 28 vols. , w. a
29th currently in press) and you will find the measures numbered in
*exactly* that way.
To me, measure numbers are written labels for written objects, and I am
hardly the only person--nor the most radical--in the past century to
question "standard" notational practices. A few years back on this list
there was a Spanish horn player who insisted passionately that key
signatures for horns were always and forever improper. This current
discussion smells a lot like that...
Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://www.kallistimusic.com/kallisti.html
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
