On 2 Apr 2008, at 11:25 PM, John Howell wrote:
At 6:15 PM -0400 4/2/08, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 2 Apr 2008, at 5:45 PM, John Howell wrote:

But replays of the original are just nostalgia. Covers or new approaches are what establish longevity, for me.

This isn't how the popular music world works. The original recording *is* the work. The vast majority of covers (well over 90 percent!) are vastly inferior. A work that is rarely covered has nothing to do with the quality of the original. Some songs lend themselves to multiple reinterpretations, and some don't.

I'm answering as an arranger, Darcy. I realize that to most people-- certainly ordinary people but unfortunately some pretty good musicians, too, and including my own kids when they were teenagers-- the original recording IS the work. But to an experienced arranger, the original recording is only one possible version and one possible arrangement of the work. Anyone who can't think outside that particular box isn't prepared to be an effective arranger, or at least not a creative one.

Since the people who hire me like to think I'm also an effective and creative arranger in my own right, let me say that I really don't see any conflict between the view that in popular music, the original recording (not what you could represent on a lead sheet) *is *the work, and the idea that such works can be reinterpreted and repurposed. As you are perhaps aware, mash-ups and remixes are extremely popular amongst "the kids today" -- in fact, Radiohead just released the individual vocal, guitar, bass, drums, and strings+FX tracks from the single "Naked," and are encouraging their fans to make their own remixes of the song, some of which differ quite radically from the original. They are even posting the remixes on their website, and allowing fans to vote for their favorites:

http://www.radioheadremix.com/

All I am saying is that a works suitability for reinterpretation (whether its arranging, covering, remixing, making mashups, or something else entirely) bears absolutely no relation to its quality. Few people have tried to cover Coltrane's _A Love Supreme_, and those that have tried have all failed very badly, in my estimation. That doesn't mean the original is a poor work, or endures only for nostalgic reasons.

And John, I'm sorry, but the idea that "replays of the original are just nostalgia" is absurd. I listen to an awful lot of music that was written and recorded before I was born. How is that nostalgia? That's more along the lines of what I would call "musical literacy."

Well, as much as I honestly respect your thinking on most things, I guess we'll just have to disagree on this. Of COURSE anyone can get a lot of enjoyment out of "Golden Oldies," but they're still "Oldies" no matter how "Golden" they may be.

I'm still not understanding your argument, which is: "replays of the original are just nostalgia." Especially when we are talking about a work that someone is discovering for the first time. "Just nostalgia" suggests that one's appreciation for the work has little or nothing to do with its value as a work, and depends largely on being reminded of something you formed a a sentimental attachment to when you were young and impressionable. So I really have no idea how my love of artists that I discovered as an adult, and whose work was made years, decades, or centuries before I was born, in any way constitutes "nostalgia." By your definition, the entire classical music establishment is based on nothing more than nostalgia.

(I'm actually not sure I entirely disagree with that view, but I also don't think that's the argument you intended to make.)

And John, I'm more than familiar with your bio and have deep respect for your experience. You, of all people, do not need to prove your bona fides to me. I just think -- and hope you will agree -- that your understanding of popular music reflects a time, a scene, and a mindset that are all radically different from what I've experienced in my own lifetime. (I was born in 1975.)

Cheers,

- Darcy
-----
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY




_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to