On 19 Aug 2008 at 14:20, Eric Dannewitz wrote: > Basically, unless you are going to be cataloging thousands if pieces, > or are interested in strange queries of your data, you don't need a > relational database
This is what many people believe. I make a large portion of my income fixing the results of that belief. Given that FileMaker comes with a library template that is relational, it seems to me to be a no-brainer that you start from that. It ought to make things *very* easy. -- David W. Fenton http://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
