David W. Fenton wrote:
On 30 Jun 2009 at 7:24, Phil Daley wrote:
At 6/29/2009 09:00 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
>On 29 Jun 2009 at 20:53, Christopher Smith wrote:
>
>> On Jun 29, 2009, at 8:35 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
>>
>> > On 29 Jun 2009 at 13:33, Christopher Smith wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'm just saying that just because the study may be valid, it
>> >> doesn't mean it applies to ME.
>> >
>> > Why would you find it important or necessary to say so?
>>
>> Well, you know, just because! Why are YOU so implicated in the
>> conversation?
>
>I'm flabbergasted at the opposition the mere reporting of a fact has
>generating.
Because it isn't a "fact".
Yes, it *is* a fact: The studies where, in FACT, done, and did, in
FACT, reach the conclusions I reported.
This is the only FACT that I reported, but you and others:
You've reported hearsay. The factual basis for it remains elusive.
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
