On 30 Jun 2009 at 22:33, Owain Sutton wrote: > David W. Fenton wrote: > > On 30 Jun 2009 at 19:03, Owain Sutton wrote: > > > >> David W. Fenton wrote: > >>> On 30 Jun 2009 at 7:24, Phil Daley wrote: > >>>> >I'm flabbergasted at the opposition the mere reporting of a fact has > >>>> >generating. > >>>> > >>>> Because it isn't a "fact". > >>> Yes, it *is* a fact: The studies where, in FACT, done, and did, in > >>> FACT, reach the conclusions I reported. > >>> > >>> This is the only FACT that I reported, but you and others: > >> You've reported hearsay. The factual basis for it remains elusive. > > > > How is it hearsay to report what the studies found? > > > > Are you claiming the studies *didn't* find this? If so, isn't it > > incumbent on *you* to provide the refutation, rather than for me to > > prove that what you've asserted is wrong? > > I don't have anything TO refute even if I wanted to, and that is my > point.
You haven't tried. > Show me the study, and I'll tell you what I think. The discussion has been going on for days and days. It's only now that you ask about seeing it, despite the fact that you've posted time and again providing commentary on the subject? > If you > continue to allude to it as fact (no, the capitals are clearly > important: FACT) while also acknowledging ignorance of how it was > implemented, I don't think I'm the one with anything to prove. I don't give a rat's ass about these studies. They are what they are. If you find the conclusions problematic, then it's not my job to show you why they aren't. Nor is it my job to research them so that you can "disprove" them. -- David W. Fenton http://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
