Just noticed today that that delete button isn't enabled for the hard
wired categories.

DH

On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Don Hart <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you, Mark.  Sounds as if we're going down similar paths, though
> I probably want a few more pre-defined expressions at my disposal than
> you.  FYI, there is a button at the bottom of the "Category Designer"
> window that allows you to delete a category.
>
> DH
>
> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Mark D Lew <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I did a big upgrade from v04 to v10 earlier this year, so adapting to the
>> new expressions is pretty fresh in my memory.
>>
>> Caveat: I doubt I'm a typical user. I've found that in general I'm more
>> detail-oriented than most here, and I tend to be a bit of a control freak.
>>
>>> If you don't mind sharing, I would like to know the various ways list
>>> members organize expressions into categories. Have any of you added
>>> new categories to the ones Finale provided?
>>
>> ALL of the expressions I used are in new categories. I didn't like Finale's
>> definitions in their default categories*, and I was having difficulty
>> editing them. At the time it seemed like there were some things that were
>> hard-coded and couldn't be changed. I'm not sure if that's actually true or
>> I just couldn't find the right dialog box.
>>
>> (*Is it just me or do Finale defaults have an awful lot of definitions that
>> are, um, eccentric? In general, MakeMusic's template style choices always
>> seem so weird to me.)
>>
>> In any case, I only wanted to use expressions that I myself had explicitly
>> defined, but I also found it useful at first to keep Finale's default ones
>> around for reference, so I made my own categories for my own expressions and
>> I only use those.
>>
>> I have four categories: tempos, dynamics, generic expressions, and rehearsal
>> numbers. For me category are purely typographic definitions, regardless of
>> musical meaning, so for example "dynamics" is anything I'd put in the music
>> font at that size, like a pedal mark or luftpause. Expressions default to
>> the usual italic, but I use that as a catch-all for anything that doesn't
>> fall into another category and I'll define the specific expression as
>> needed.
>>
>> I don't put many expressions in my template. Except for dynamics, my
>> categories start out nearly empty, with just a couple of really basic ones.
>> They exist primarily for the category definition, then I'll add expressions
>> as needed in each document. I haven't found it valuable to have a zillion
>> expressions pre-made. If I need, say, "molto allargando", it's easier to
>> just type it fresh than hunt through a list of 50 phrases looking for it.
>>
>>> A couple of related questions about category staff lists (some have
>>> 'em, some don't):  Is there a way to get a new expression category
>>> with (or without) staff list capabilities besides through duplication?
>>>  Is there a way to turn on/off the staff list feature for a given
>>> category?
>>
>> I remember wondering the same thing.  After looking around a bit I just gave
>> up and used duplication.  I also couldn't figure out how to delete
>> categories I don't want. I'm not sure that's possible either.
>>
>> mdl
>> _______________________________________________
>> Finale mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to