Is that solution yours? If so, permission to steal please?! I've had occasions where that is the perfect solution. Steve P.
On 4 Feb 2011, at 23:45, SN jef chippewa <[email protected]> wrote: > > depends on the context i would say. > > http://newmusicnotation.com/TEMPFILES/pression_breakbeams.tif > > i have broken beams over clefs before but in this example it makes sense not > to, but i think it is ugly as hell when the stems are made really high to > avoid collisions, and in this particular case that would not really make > anything clearer. i came up with a very time-consuming (but damn sexy!) > solution involving beam extensions and custom lines the thickness of beams. > > there is a continuous gliss on a scord. C-string, the finger is slightly > pressed on the string and released at the rests, so a huge jump in interval. > the option to have the stems up doesn't work here (would otherwise be a great > solution) because stems down is used throughout the piece to indicate things > done by the left hand (here the gliss). > > normally i would break the beams entirely but here they are extremely helpful > in grouping the quarter notes, which are not as easy to see because of the > rather large compromises in horizontal spacing due to clefs and other things. > > _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
