On Nov 1, 2012, at 2:24 PM, John Howell <[email protected]> wrote:

> In terms of score (rather than parts), our jazz 
> writers seem to use them a lot, although I've 
> never asked them exactly why.

Because it looks like the landscape-oriented bigband manuscript pads people 
used to use in the hand-copying days, and because of that, most published 
bigband charts had landscape-oriented scores, and all the bigband templates in 
notation software are also landscape oriented. It also fits well on 16:9 and 
16:10 aspect computer screens.

Landscape on paper is *awful* though, especially on 8.5"x11" -- it's totally 
illegible at that reduction. Even at 11"x17" landscape, it's still too small 
for a full bigband (18-20 staves on every page), and the page turns are 
ridiculous. 

I've always used portrait, and have tried to persuade others to use portrait. 
But old habits die hard.

Cheers,

- DJA
-----
WEB: http://www.secretsocietymusic.org



_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to