Depending how many exceptions there are, you could hide the occurrences on the staves you don't want.
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Lee Actor <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry I wasn't more explicit. I want rehearsal marks to appear at the top > of the score and on the soloist staff (this is a concerto with orchestra > accompaniment). On pages where all the staves above the soloist are > hidden, > I want a rehearsal mark on the next staff below the soloist as well. > > I see what you're saying about skipping the auto-sequencing completely at > that point, and inserting a different expression. Is there a way to do it > while retaining the auto-sequence functionality? > > -Lee > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of > Robert Patterson > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 5:26 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Finale] Rehearsal marks > > Without knowing exactly what you are trying to do, it is difficult to > advise. If necessary, you can create the single purpose expression, but why > would you need to hide it in the parts? You can simply have the > auto-sequencing skip that mark. > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Lee Actor <[email protected]> wrote: > > > In Finale 2012, has anyone found a straightforward way to change the > staff > > list assignment for a single instance of an auto-sequenced rehearsal > mark? > > I don't see a way to do this without a kludgy workaround (like defining a > > new single-purpose expression for the score and hiding it in the parts). > > > > -Lee > > > > > > Lee Actor > > Composer-in-Residence and Assistant Conductor, Palo Alto Philharmonic > > http://www.leeactor.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
