I agree that the line over the notes is an out-of-tempo sign. But I find the transcription overhelmingly pedantic and unnecessary difficult. It distorts the idea of a score as a guide for making music, provided there's also the recording. And it makes me wonder why the use of apoggiaturas, they must've been transcribed also into regular rhhythm notation to keep the idea.
IMHO Rafael J On 3 July 2015 at 14:25, Michael <[email protected]> wrote: > That is a very strange way to transcribe the rhythm. I can’t see any > logical reason for the brackets you mention: I’d just ignore them. > > I’d be very interested to see your final version of this. How are you > going to approach the notation of the rhythms? Put it all in 4/4 and give > detailed rubato indications? > > Greetings, > Michael > > > On 2 Jul 2015, at 22:34, Barbara Touburg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 2-7-2015 22:26, Chuck Israels wrote: > >> Hi Barbara, > >> > >> Can you send me a photo of the score - something that might show the > surrounding context? Then I might be able to figure out what the bracket > indicates. > >> > >> Chuck > > > > > > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4vumyjk0X8> > > > > mm 48-9, 51, 129-132, 142-3, 147-9, etc. > > _______________________________________________ > > Finale mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > > > > To unsubscribe from finale send a message to: > > [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > > To unsubscribe from finale send a message to: > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale To unsubscribe from finale send a message to: [email protected]
