Hi,
we are dealing with arithmetic, not even with mathematics; 3+3=6, no
matter what you can 'feel'. The musical expression comes through the
notation, but it is not the notation.
Cheers,
Paolo
Il 30/05/2019 10:31, SN jef chippewa ha scritto:
criticizing a particular notation without knowing the context, piece
or composer is wrong (and silly).
there is no need to subtly slam new complexity composers, this rhythm
is hardly complex, and the OP asked how to do it, not if it was
"wrong". further, to discredit an entire practice (one you seem to
feel is unifed ["they are wrong"], though this is hardly the case)
based on such a simple rhythm, which quite possibly has nothing to do
with new complexity, is kind of reactionary.
the context of this rhythmic division (which i also don't know) could
very well be explained by looking at surrounding measures or other
similar instances in the piece, perhaps reflecting a proportional
relation that is important to the proper understanding and performance
of the piece. personally, i would need to start there before at all
being able to judge whether *i* feel it is wrong -- in *that* context.
At 12:22 AM +0200 5/30/19, <[email protected]> wrote:
I can't figure that rhythm; how on earth you can write it? two dotted
halves makes six quarter, not five. You can find such rhythms in
contemporary ('new complexity') composers, but they are wrong (and
silly).
---
Questa email è stata esaminata alla ricerca di virus da AVG.
http://www.avg.com
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
[email protected]
