Do you have oaf-0.6.10-2 ?  If so then it seems strange that oaf-config
returns a version of 0.6.8.  I've got 0.6.10-2 and oaf-config returns
the correct version info.  If you are at 0.6.10-1 then maybe try
updating oaf by itself, and if you are at 0.6.10-2 try rebuilding it.

On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 03:28, Tom Robinson wrote:
> >OK, how about trying to do the force-depends with a newer version of
> >gnome-vfs?  See if you can do a 'fink build gnome-vfs', hopefully
> >getting 1.05, and then do the dpkg -i force-depends on the resulting
> >deb.
> 
> Well, it looks like I got the latest version, but now there's complaints about OAF.
> 
> I'm out of my league here.  I'm happy to keep following suggestions but if there's a 
>simpler reinstallation type option it may be easier on you guys?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> [175 ~/Desktop]% fink rebuild gnome-vfs
> sudo /sw/bin/fink  rebuild gnome-vfs
> Password:
> Information about 1328 packages read in 2 seconds.
> 
> pkg gnome-vfs  version ###
> pkg gnome-vfs  version 1.0.5-5
> The following package will be rebuilt:
>  gnome-vfs
> The following 9 additional packages will be installed:
>  gconf-dev gconf-shlibs gnome-libs-dev gnome-libs-shlibs gnome-vfs-shlibs
>  guile-dev guile-shlibs oaf-dev oaf-shlibs
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n] 
> 
> [snip]
> 
> checking whether the linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes
> checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... unsupported
> checking whether stripping libraries is possible... no
> checking dynamic linker characteristics... darwin5.4 dyld
> checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
> checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... yes
> creating libtool
> FYI:  Using default config source xml::${sysconfdir}/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults for 
>schema installation
> FYI:  Will build without debugging code
> checking for poptGetArg in -lpopt... yes
> checking for glib-config... /sw/bin/glib-config
> checking for GLIB - version >= 1.2.0... yes
> checking for oaf-config... /sw/bin/oaf-config
> checking for OAF - version >= 0.2.0... 
> *** 'oaf-config --version' returned 0.6.8, but OAF (0.6.10)
> *** was found! If oaf-config was correct, then it is best
> *** to remove the old version of OAF. You may also be able to fix the error
> *** by modifying your LD_LIBRARY_PATH enviroment variable, or by editing
> *** /etc/ld.so.conf. Make sure you have run ldconfig if that is
> *** required on your system.
> *** If oaf-config was wrong, set the environment variable OAF_CONFIG
> *** to point to the correct copy of oaf-config, and remove the file config.cache
> *** before re-running configure
> no
> configure: error: OAF not found or too old
> ### execution of ./configure failed, exit code 1
> Failed: compiling gconf-1.0.9-1 failed
> -- 
> All stressed out, and no one to choke
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
> cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
> https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
> _______________________________________________
> Fink-beginners mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
-- 
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
Levitated Dipole Experiment
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, 175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA  02139-4213
Phone:  617-252-1818    Fax:    208-988-4057


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Fink-beginners mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners

Reply via email to