Sylvain Chevillard wrote:
OK. Thank you very much. That's OK. It has compiled and it runs without any problem. And it has understood that tetex was already installed.Yes. The idea is to leave the management of the "stable" and "unstable" directories to fink and its update mechanisms and do your private testing (or package creation) in the "local" tree. The local tree is searched before the "official" unstable and stable trees, at least with the usual configuration, so that in the case of identical version numbers your "local" copy will be used.
So I'll write to the package maintainer to correct this point.
If I've good understand what you have said to me to do, I understand that the /sw/fink/dists/local/main/finkinfo directory is a sort of personnal directory for Fink to search info about depedencies. Isn't it
? I should have been allowed to make the changes ("bundle-tetex | system-tetex" instead of "bundle-tetex") directly in the /sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/text/ directory. Is it exact ?Yes, but it is not a good idea, in general.
--
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
_______________________________________________
Fink-beginners mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
