On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 03:37 , Matt Wallace wrote: > Also I think the, "we don't want to get sued" line is weak. If > somebody > has a problem with their software being distributed they mail the > list and > it's taken off the distribution. But more to the point, if someone is > distributing the source to their software, what complaint would > they make > if you compiled it and distributed it. My main evidence for this > is that > every package in fink is present in Debian, and no one has sued > them, and > they are a hell of a lot more high profile that Fink is.
Well, it's not weak, though perhaps a bit strained. qmail by Dan Berstein is under a source-only distribution. He allows for binary distributions in a very narrow set of circumstances. I believe most of his other software is as well. I can certainly see it happening, even if it is uncommon. Zac _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
