-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
OK, so it's proof of concept. That clears things up for me. On Saturday, January 19, 2002, at 02:22 AM, Max Horn wrote: > At 1:30 Uhr -0800 19.01.2002, Daniel Parks wrote: [ . . . ] >> On Friday, January 18, 2002, at 07:06 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote: [ . . . ] >>> <maintainer><![CDATA[John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]]></maintainer> >> >> Ugh. Time to learn XML "for real." > > Huh, what? I don't like doing it like that, but I's perfectly legal. The > < and > appearing in the data have to be marked as CDATA. otherwise the > file would be invalid XML. An alternative would be to translate them to > > and < but I think that would be a really bad idea. So I think > your remark is not very fitting. > In any case, for my opinion on this, see above/my other mail. I meant that I didn't understand the syntax; that /I/ should learn XML "for real." The "ugh" was because I thought it looked ugly... I like entities better, but that's because I'm used to HTML. This is certainly easier to read, though. I didn't mean to comment on Kyle's knowledge of XML -- he obviously has a much better grasp of it than me. (Can anyone recommend a good book on XML/ XSL/etc.?) Sorry for any perceived insult, Kyle! Daniel - -- PGP public key: http://mwdesign.dyndns.org/~daniel/publickey.txt ACA4 FA04 4033 0569 C626 AA1A C489 25A5 5F67 C125 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (Darwin) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8SfhdxIklpV9nwSURAvXCAKCEXKgyvJ27r+Z77XQrlFZPbcjKewCfS5Dy XqZ31NpubEoCz4D9EfYQvXE= =6hYK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
