On Saturday, January 19, 2002, at 05:50 , Daniel Parks wrote:
> I meant that I didn't understand the syntax; that /I/ should learn XML > "for real." The "ugh" was because I thought it looked ugly... I like > entities better, but that's because I'm used to HTML. This is certainly > easier to read, though. > > I didn't mean to comment on Kyle's knowledge of XML -- he obviously has > a much better grasp of it than me. (Can anyone recommend a good book on > XML/ > XSL/etc.?) Sorry for any perceived insult, Kyle! > > Daniel None taken :-) Oh, and by the way, a good primer on xml, dtds, and xsl is available from O'Reilly books "XML Pocket Reference," ISBN 1-56592-709-5, though you might look to see if they have any newer/better/bigger books available, the one I have is a couple of years old. The standards have probably changed a lot since then. Hope this helps, Kyle Moffett _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
